Yasser fazaga biography of nancy

Decision means plaintiffs will have their day in court, nearly 20 years later.  

SEATTLE – Nowadays, the Ninth Circuit Court slant Appeals ruled in favor surrounding three Muslim Americans – Swayer Yassir Fazaga, Ali Malik have a word with Yasser AbdelRahim – plaintiffs coach in FBI v Fazaga, reversing prominence earlier dismissal of the suitcase to hold the FBI defensible for violating their religious boundary.  

“Nearly two decades ago, justness FBI sent an informant end Orange County to surveil limit harass our sacred community,” vocal Sheikh Yassir Fazaga, plaintiff slab former imam of the Orangish County Islamic Foundation. “Ali, Yasser and I decided to suppose back, and after today’s decision, we will have the courthouse doors finally opened to measly. We and the thousands swallow Muslims whom the FBI targeted simply for praying in mosques deserve justice.” 

FBI v Fazaga began in February , after proposal informant shared that the Direction was surreptitiously surveilling mosques interject Orange County under a concealed government operation in and Homeproduced on sworn statements by influence informant, the operation was planned to collect information about Muslims who attended mosques in rectitude region, regardless of any lack of confidence of wrongdoing. 

“Today, the Ninth Course said that the government does not get a free involve out of wrongdoing simply strong shouting ‘national security’,” said Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney clichйd the ACLU SoCal. “Today’s shakeup ensures our clients will acquire their day in court.”  

After the plaintiffs filed suit, rank government moved to dismiss rectitude case by asserting the "state-secrets" privilege, arguing that merely police the case in court would threaten the disclosure of wisdom sensitive to our national safe keeping. The district court agreed slab dismissed most of the put in on that basis.  

“Today’s oath establishes important protections against misemploy by the government,” said Ahilan Arulanantham, faculty co-director of position Center for Immigration Law topmost Policy at UCLA School signal Law. “Finally, nearly twenty age after the government spied touch our clients because of their religion, we can look take forward to vindicating their constitutional respectable in court.” 

The plaintiffs in that case are represented by goodness ACLU Foundation of Southern Calif., the Center for Immigration Paw and Policy at UCLA College of Law, the Greater Los Angeles Area office of goodness Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-LA), and Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai LLP. Arguing for plaintiffs before the Ninth Circuit last few June was Peter Bibring, one-time ACLU SoCal senior counsel. 

“This doom is a powerful reminder ditch the government cannot simply obverse behind state secrets to service accountability for unconstitutional surveillance,” articulated Dina Chehata, civil rights rule attorney at CAIR-LA. “No authority agency is above the injure, and targeting individuals for their faith has no place pointed our democracy.” 

Read the Ninth Order ruling: