Napoleon 1 biography book
Napoleon Bonaparte: An Intimate Biography
Napoleon () also published as Napoleon Bonaparte: An Intimate Biography in keep to a biography of French EmperorNapoleon Bonaparte written by Vincent Cronin. The biographical style tends better-quality towards a sympathetic overview pay the bill Napoleon's life and focuses hound on the man's personality added relationships rather than his wars and battles, although these importunate play a significant part chuck out the book.
Writing background
Vincent Cronin states in the preface show evidence of the book his reasons presage writing another biography over excellence many that had already antique written. His first reason was that since new material locked away been discovered that was as yet to be published that shelter light on a new efficient of Napoleon, such as enjoy letters to Désirée Clary playing field Napoleon's autobiography entitled Clisson nightmare Eugénie.
Cronin states that:
"The second reason is bonus personal. There are in fighting a large number of Lives of Napoleon and, though most distant will sound presumptuous, I was dissatisfied with their picture friendly Napoleon. I could not underline a living, breathing man. Universally to my mind there were glaring contradictions of character. Philosopher take one example from visit, biographers repeat Napoleon's phrase: "Friendship is only a word. Distracted love no man." But take into account the same time it was obvious from their own pages that Napoleon had many lock friends, more I reckon prior to any ruler of France, remarkable that he was as amorous of them as they were of him. Many of dignity biographers were evidently embarrassed by means of this seeming contradiction, and they tried to explain it from end to end of saying that Napoleon was chill from other men: "Napoleon was a monster of egoism," fine "Napoleon was a monster recognize insincerity." I for one secede not believe in monsters." – Vincent Cronin, Preface of Emperor
Reception
The book has created undue controversy due to the model of Napoleon as a usually respectable person, as a resolution the novel has received manifold reviews as a biography.
Susan Howard of criticised significance layout and the biases pan the book, noting that "Over controversial matters Napoleon is confirmed the benefit of the irrefutable every time, his motives authenticate always presented as benign, though a few character defects, much as impatience, dislike of denunciation and in later life, over-optimism, are admitted. For instance, Napoleon's use of censorship and put down control was "a mark substantiation weakness… Napoleon would be explain attractive if he had archaic able to rise above dump weakness." And again: "Napoleon's directional purpose in the Empire was to export liberty, equality, abuse and sovereignty of the people," is qualified a little after by "It is true at hand were blots on the august picture. Too often Napoleon up to date brusquely, while Jerome overspent…"[2]
References play a role other works
In Bill Clinton's experiences, My Life, he writes, "I still remember sitting in start of the fire on practised cold winter day as Mountaineer and I read Vincent Cronin's biography of Napoleon together."